To The Editor

I have never in my media career defended the Walt Disney Company. Having said that, I believe is that Disney has every right to distribute or not distribute the new Michael Moore film. It is not up to the New York Times to decide that they don't approve of why Disney did what it did.. Had Disney precluded the Distribution of the film by anyone else, that would not be "a good thing", but they did not do that. Would it be improper to suggest that Moore's agent quoted Eisners reasons for not releasing the film in order to create the controversy it has to enhance the value if the film? An agent would never do that, or would he?

Norman Horowitz

Back to Articles